Tue 13 Mar 2007
Be the First to Comment
Given the anticipated growth patterns in Orange County, siting the transfer station near a high capacity transit corridor would seem to be best. The BOCC has two additional sites located at just such a location – the Eno Economic Development District [EEDD] (as I noted in Orange County’s Garbage Center of Gravity).
The EEDD is not without some flaws, including the nearby Eno River, but given the access to the already heavily travelled Hwy. 70/I-85 and a nearly adjacent railroad corridor, the EEDD’s transit profile appears quite promising.
After reviewing the various advisory board, staff and other recommendations made over the last few years on siting a transfer station I’m struck by how options were narrowed in absence of other factors.
It would be great if the reassessment that Mark Chilton has called for would include a new kind of decision matrix that took into account a wider variety of factors for deciding a new location:
economic, social and environmental impacts, future growth – including Carolina North, the current and projected centers of waste creation (like UNC), energy costs, etc.
In other words, we need a decision matrix that incorporates more dimensions than a straight landfill engineering problem. That matrix should assign values to social, environmental, economic, etc. impacts and assess possible sites against that metric.
The two US70E sites referenced in tonight’s agenda item [PDF] are:
5412 US70E. Tax Value: $654,435. Asking Price: $3.8M. Size: 19.05 acres.
5701 US70E. Tax Value: $326,942. Asking Price: $2.0M. Size: 16.27 acres.
Google MAP of general area.
Here are the profiles for each of the selected sites:
|5412 US 70E (click image to expand)||5701 US 70E (click image to expand)|