Holden, a few quick points.

One, the economic justification for siting a new airport in Orange County are not supportable at this point in time. The Talbert/Bright 2008 draft economic report is, frankly, a joke. It is embarrassing that a great institution like UNC maintains that this report’s projections are credible. Reality is a necessary component to this process.

Two, the Authority cannot be staffed exclusively with folks that have “better expertise” in airport development. Local residents deserve not only a seat at the table but enough of a presence to sway the decision-making process. In the end, a balanced approach, pulling talented individuals with informed opinions across the spectrum, will better serve the interests of both the University and the State’s citizenry.

Third, Talbert-Bright has said twice now that AHEC’s future is at RDU. While I support AHEC’s mission and am completely open-minded on improving their ability to serve our State’s needs, continuing to use AHEC as a justification for creating a new general aviation facility doesn’t wash.

Finally, here’s a link to a chronology of UNC positions on HWA’s growth and usage.

http://townhall.townofchapelhill.org/Agendas/ca040414/10-Response%20to%20Petiton%20re%20Horace%20Williams%20Airport.htm

It’s an interesting course that UNC has charted over the years.

Thank you for posting your thoughts on HWA (and entertaining commentary). I look forward to seeing the evolution of your and the University’s thinking on this issue.