UNC’s Board of Trustee Roger Perry: You’re Insulted?

UNC trustee and local developer Roger Perry said his sense was that UW-Madison officials essentially tell the community that the university’s mission requires it to do a certain project, and then everyone goes to work on preventing negative impacts, without trying to stop the project in general.

He said he’d like to get to that point in Chapel Hill, and that it can be somewhat “insulting” when someone not connected to UNC says they really aren’t convinced the university needs to do what it says it needs to do.

HeraldSun 09/27/06

Perry is insulted when someone outside of UNC questions the whys-and-wherefores of campus development?

What the hell? Near quoting from the authoritarianism playbook, Perry says he likes a community that doesn’t question the diktat of the university – a community that just “deals” with the university’s negative impacts.

Perry appears to long for the day when citizens “shut up” and STOP SAYING they aren’t really convinced about what the university needs to do. My guess? It isn’t the citizen taxpayer questioning the “needs” as much as the citizen taxpayer that questions the “hows” that really inflames his ire.

The obvious sub-text is Carolina North.

The fine residents of our community, the hard-working taxpaying citizens of our State, deserve more than the University’s current flimsy assertions of positive financial, economic and social impacts. From a straight business perspective, for the investment demanded of our community and State, the return is hardly clear.

While I believe the University needs to expand, I have been quite clear that the justifications UNC, to-date, have offered up for Carolina North are, at best, fundamentally weak, at worse, downright disingenuous.

Roger Perry and the rest of UNC’s Board of Trustees absolutely must address the glaring absence of any reasonable, documented, calculable return on investment before I, a single North Carolina citizen taxpayer, will be convinced of the soundness of their plans.

Of course, this is the board Carolina North’s designated quarterback Jack Evans claims can’t handle reading a 15 page list of development principles for Carolina North.

What a trip for the Carolina North boys. Perry’s “shut up” is a fine bookend to Moeser’s reaction to “freelance dissent”.


One response to “UNC’s Board of Trustee Roger Perry: You’re Insulted?”

  1. Administrator Avatar

    There was some good news out of Madison and some sly remarks – can you find them?

    Rob Shappard reports “Pat Crawford, senior associate university council, saying UNC officials made an honest mistake in not anticipating concerns from neighbors, because the university saw the site as an internal part of campus.”

    “We just blew that call,” she said.

    That’s a hand across the divide.

    Chapel Hill’s Bill Strom weighs in on dissent within THIS community.

    Carrboro’s Dan Coleman comments on the “good natured” feel of Madison town-n-gown relationships. Sounds like UWM started out 11 years ago to fix the kind of breach UNC has with the our community today. And a decade on, it’s healed.

Leave a Reply