Chapel HIll, NC
Dear Maurice,
We represent neighborhoods in “Estes Neighbors”, a loosely organized advocacy group of 12 neighborhoods, who are concerned about and certain to be affected by the new proposed Aura development at the intersection of Estes Drive and MLK jr. Blvd. Many of the
residents now engaged were also involved in the Town’s focus area project called Central West that culminated in the Small Area Plan for the area.
We are writing to request that you delay the review process for the proposed Aura Conditional Use Permit. The Town AURA webpage has just been updated to include Advisory Board review meetings. We object to proceeding with Advisory Board review without fulfilling
the requests promised to the residents by the Town Planning staff. These are:
1. The public asked these questions at the November 10th information session and the Acting Planning Director promised a
response.
We’ve received no answers to date. (see file below)
2. Neighbors asked an additional 14 questions concerning traffic at the Feb 10, 2021 Aura Traffic Public Meeting. No response.
(see
file below)
3. At the Feb 10 transportation forum hosted by the Town staff, over 80 people attended to learn about the updated traffic impact
analysis and Estes Drive and MLKjr Blvd traffic issues. At that
time, Chapel Hill planners promised to hold another meeting to
present the town wide visual traffic model that will aid everyone in understanding, not only the local traffic impacts of the project,
but the impact of other Town developments underway and projects approved in the larger area of town. No date has yet been set.
We request that these Advisory Board meetings be rescheduled until these important elements are completed. In addition, we request that different advisory board meetings not be held at the same day and time. For example the current schedule calls for the Transportation
and the CDC Boards to meet at the same time. There are also some date errors on the
Aura town page.
Thank you for considering this request. If the schedule were to be left to stand as is, we feel strongly that the Town would not be conducting a fair public process for the many affected citizens by this proposal.
Thank you!
Fred Lampe, Coker Hills,
Jill Blackburn, Coker Hills
