Subject: Question about NS BRT and Aura project. (Cc to ESAB and CDC)
From: Donna Rubinoff
Date: 3/29/21, 1:25 PM
To: Hongbin Gu <hgu@townofchapelhill.org>, Bergen Watterson <bwatterson@townofchapelhill.org>
CC: Melissa McCullough <melissamccnc@gmail.com>, mayorandcouncil@townofchapelhill.org, advisoryboards@townofchapelhill.org

Sender: rubinoff@colorado.edu
Subject: Question about NS BRT and Aura project. (Cc to ESAB and CDC)
Message-Id: <204AA5A7-0C52-45DC-BFDB-A4032F68ECDE@colorado.edu>
Recipient: hgu@townofchapelhill.org

Subject: Question about NS BRT and Aura project. (Cc to ESAB and CDC)
From: Donna Rubinoff <rubinoff@colorado.edu>
Date: 3/29/21, 1:24 PM
To: Hongbin Gu <hgu@townofchapelhill.org>, Bergen Watterson <bwatterson@townofchapelhill.org>
CC: Melissa McCullough <melissamccnc@gmail.com>, mayorandcouncil@townofchapelhill.org, advisoryboards@townofchapelhill.org

External email: Don't click links or attachments from unknown senders. To check or report forward to reportspam@townofchapelhill.org

Hello Hongbin and Bergen, 

I’m writing as a resident of Chapel Hill and also in my capacity as Chapel Hill at-large member of the Orange County Climate Council. 

I’m following the Aura project and it’s raising some questions about its BRT interface. My concerns are also important to consider in other major developments, such as University Inn, University Mall, etc.

We have a real opportunity to design these mixed-use projects to showcase their TOD/transit oriented development qualities….more than the weak version we are being presented with currently. To do this, we need to carve out dedicated space designed to celebrate and ease the project interface with public transit, rather than making transit a tack-on, an after thought, a mere “bus stop”.  The public transit/land use interface must be a ‘thing” a ‘place,” a “space,” and it must be beautiful, not invisible. By designing a consistent and celebratory “user friendly” transit interface across multiple locations, this will help to build up the transit market, and achieve our climate goals of using dense development to reduce Vehicle Miles Travelled. Please note, I am not talking about designing pretty bus stops, I am talking about urban design. 

1. I’m not sure if the BRT have separate outside lanes or a center lane configuration…. But either way, can we really “punch up” the Aura adjacent interface with BRT stop so that it’s more than a "tacked on Bus Stop next to Aura.” At this point, the developer has not even shown that interface in its designs. 

2. If we can foreground the TOD qualities to make it a showcase for “Integrated transit/land use planning”, we may be able to justify a significant reduction in parking. This would go a long way to counteract the challenges of auto oriented congestion and also demonstrate our commitment to climate action.

3. The Aura issue also makes me realize I want to see more about the broader BRT system. 
  • Do you plan to extend it E/W or loop it so it goes through the other densification nodes? Thinking about a loop across Estes through Blue Hill, west on Weaver Dairy. 
  • Or at a minimum, if E/W BRT is not envisioned, are you planning to strengthen a CH Bus loop through those locations by naming/branding it, such as Boulder does with the Hop, Skip and Jump. These are 10-15 minute consistent bus lines. While Hop primarily serves the University community, the others are community wide service. 
  • The other locations would want to coordinate design with the transit stops so that there is a similar urban design quality, that will make it very easy for riders to identify the stops and become very comfortable with using them. 

Happy to discuss any of these issues further, 
Kind regards, 
Donna




Donna D. Rubinoff 🌏🌎🌍
102 Kirkwood Drive