Tue 12 Sep 2006
North Carolina Diktat: Thou Shalt Pledge Allegiance
Posted by WillR under ChapelHill , CitizenWill , CivilLiberties , LocalPolitics , Ruminations[3] Comments
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “North Carolina Diktat: Thou Shalt Pledge Allegiance”.
I thought you might be interested in http://www.undergodprocon.org. It is the nets biggest resource on the Pledge issue which looks extensively at the legal aspects and the coercion debate.
“So, recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance is required”
This is and untrue statement. The copy of the GS displayed on this page has omitted the main head of the statute for which this subsection falls under and shows the true meaning of the statute:
“In addition to the powers and duties designated in G.S. 115C‑36, local boards of education shall have the power or duty:
(29a) To Require the Display of the United States and North Carolina Flags, and to Require the Recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. – Local boards of education shall adopt policies to (i) require the display of the United States and North Carolina flags in each classroom, when available, (ii) require that recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance be scheduled on a daily basis, and (iii) provide age‑appropriate instruction on the meaning and historical origins of the flag and the Pledge of Allegiance. These policies shall not compel any person to stand, salute the flag, or recite the Pledge of Allegiance. If flags are donated or are otherwise available, flags shall be displayed in each classroom.”
This empowers the local school boards to require display an recitation of oath/allegiance as a daily routine in its schools, but still does not force individuals to perform the routine.
You paint a distorted in this site.
Actually, I think I was pretty clear that group recitation in and of itself can be a very compelling reason.
This post is based on a real incident involving a local citizen’s child who had “both the strength of their convictions to stand firm and the poise, even when emotionally assailed, to do so without rancor or upset.”
The teacher he was dealing with hit the wall when the student tried to exercise his right to not make the pledge (because of the “God” clause, I believe). Very serious threats were made against the child – totally unacceptable in the land of the free.
I’ll stick by what I originally said “It is a hollow affirmation that must be compelled.”