Last night I got an invite from Ruby Sinreich to engage other candidates on her local ‘blog OrangePolitics. Though I was an avid contributor to her ‘blog for several years, contributing a significant portion of the content, I have declined to participate in building her readership or commercial “brand” during this year’s election cycle.
My reasons for not participating are varied, many of which persist as covered in this “swan song” post from December, 2007.
- an escalating and stifling intolerance of valid though different viewpoints,
- the site’s authors acting as surrogates for political allies who didn’t have the courage to engage the community directly in an honest, fact-based and open manner
- and an unwillingness on my part to work hard in “building the brand†of a site that advertised one thing – engaging the wider community in an informative discussion of local “progressive†issues – and delivering another.
I haven’t read much of OP since then, mainly looking in when someone sends me a link of interest (like my “winning” a very unscientific straw poll for whom should be appointed to Bill Thorpe’s vacant seat). From what I’ve seen, Ruby has taken to heart some of my critique, including opening up authorship to folks she used to vehemently chastise. Good for her.
It is clear, though, that Ruby regularly continues breaking her own editorial rules when my name arises. I prefer to engage directly with other candidates rather than their surrogates. It is a more honest, open and transparent process – a process I cherish and that Chapel Hill voters deserve.
I wish that there was another local alternative to OP for political wonks, like myself, to engage in broad, open, inclusive discussion of the many serious issues facing our community. Unfortunately, the closest we have come is the Chapel Hill News’ OrangeChat, a ‘blog whose posts sometimes spur a genuine discussion of issues.
As a candidate who has engaged a broad spectrum of constituencies, has never turned down an opportunity to solicit our community for their ideas or discuss the realities of living in Chapel Hill, I regret that I might miss out on a great conversation.
That said, I will continue to maintain my “web presence” here on CitizenWill, post all my responses to the varied community election questionnaires, feature (hopefully) video of election forums, etc. I will seek out every opportunity to meet our citizens (send invites to campaign@willraymond.org)to listen and respond to their concerns.
And, if there’s a ‘blog you think I should be posting on, please post the link in the comments section.
See you on the campaign trail!
I would agree that Orange Politics is too tightly censored. If I have ever posted a comment that was contrary to Ruby’s, it has never shown up.
Who needs that kind of control? It’s totally freaky!
I would rearrange the order of your posts on this site to reflect current material at the top. I have logged on a number of times and continued to see your kick-off comments at the top, only to immediately log-off.
Another comment (besides putting the current stuff at the top), how about a list of the controversial issues over the past several years, with your positions and links to more detailed past posts.
It would be good for voters to see a record of your involvement against Lot 5, East 54, anxiety over Carolina North, location of the Waste Transfer. etc.
It seems like the incombents are more than willing to adopt your original positions today, yet they are the ones who voted to create the mess we now face.
Why didn’t they listen to you when there was an opportunity to get it right the first time?