A nice follow up to Terri’s homeless census post is Mark Zimmerman’s My View column in the recent Chapel Hill News
How do you solve the homeless problem? Give them a home.
That almost sounds like a bad joke, doesn’t it? But it’s what the Orange County Partnership to End Homelessness Steering Committee is about to propose in its Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness. The partnership includes 60 community leaders representing dozens of organizations working on a local plan in response to a federal homelessness initiative.
Included among the partnership’s recommendations is a plan to move chronically homeless from the streets into permanent housing accompanied by intensive services.
The program is a relatively new idea called Housing First. It’s a federal initiative based on the principle that some people — the chronically homeless — need the stability of a residence before they can overcome the issues that led to their homelessness. The traditional model has required people to become “housing ready” before getting their own place. Housing First turns that model on its head.
So who are these chronically homeless? They are a group born of a federal definition: individuals, homeless for at least a year, or consistently homeless over several years, with a disability (often substance abuse or mental illness). These are folks who haven’t just been hit with problems. They have become part of their problem.
The chronically homeless are a minority of the homeless population (39 were counted in Orange County last year). However, they are among the most visible. Current treatment and care programs haven’t proven very effective. This group uses a disproportionate share of services, draining limited resources. They are costly to our hospitals and are more likely to draw police attention. They are often the ones who invoke the unfortunate vituperation of some residents, businesses and visitors.
That “vituperation” has been commented on extensively over on this thread at OrangePolitics.
Mark continues:
Housing First will take a commitment from the community to succeed, especially since we don’t want to divert funds currently assisting the transitional and non-chronically homeless. Indeed, Housing First is just one of multiple strategies in the Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness to address the continuum of housing needs in our community.
I hope this proposal will engage our community in productive debate, for there is one point on which both advocates for and detractors of our homeless population agree: We should get these folks off the streets. Whatever else you may think about it, Housing First promises to accomplish that.
Checkout the whole column to see how Mark’s thinking change over the course of his investigations.
Will, Notice that Mark says there were 39 chronically homeless individuals identified during the January 2006 PIT count. This January there were 71. That’s a huge jump.
Yes, we seem to be following national trends.
I know the recent HUD study – which reported 754,000 homeless in ’07 – has its critics but, at least, it’s a start.
One problem, as you noted elsewhere, is trying to find folks that usually make it their job to stay hidden. The other is the narrow definition of homelessness that HUD uses:
So, folks that didn’t have a home but maybe were living “temporarily” with relatives or in a shelter the night of the HUD counts would not be included.
Not surprisingly, the make up of our homeless populations doesn’t reflect the make up of our population:
A statistic that goes to Fred Black’s recent comments.
The mentally ill, unfortunately, comprise a large segment:
Sunday, March 11, 2007, Danielle Kwateng, Howard University News Service
Interesting that even where the numbers seemed to have stabilized and why:
Modesto, California’s Modesto Bee, Mar. 6th, 2007
Providing permanent homes for the chronic homeless does seem to work in community’s focused on that goal. Take Quincy, Mass.
Boston Globe, Mar. 1st, 2007
I thought Mark’s comments about his journey – from a skeptical real-estate dude to convert – was notable.