Another back and forth between Orange County Democrats over the Iraq debacle, local Representative Price’s efforts to scale it back and the party’s local leadership communicating that effectively (OrangePolitics Art on Weaver and Nudge Price, No More War Funding).
On the cusp of Bush’s Iraq “surge” the moment has come for the Democratic Party, and our local Representative David Price (contact), to make a stand.
This far and no farther, if for no other reason than the selfish desire to preserve what shred of credibility remains with their party’s leadership.
As I noted, Iraq 2007 has been quite bloody for civilians as exemplified by these individual incidents:
- 01/16/07 100 killed, 245 wounded
- 01/22/07 75 killed, 160 wounded
- 01/30/07 38 killed, 100 wounded
- 02/01/07 60 killed, 150 wounded
- 02/03/07 120 killed, 340 wounded
- 02/12/07 90 killed, 190 wounded
- 02/18/07 60 killed
- 03/06/07 120 killed, 200 wounded
The coalition casualties continue to mount.
There have been 3,451 coalition deaths â€” 3,193 Americans, two Australians, 134 Britons, 13 Bulgarians, six Danes, two Dutch, two Estonians, one Fijian, one Hungarian, 32 Italians, one Kazakh, three Latvian, 19 Poles, two Romanians, five Salvadoran, four Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and 18 Ukrainians â€” in the war in Iraq as of March 12, 2007, according to a CNN count.
There have been 536 coalition deaths â€” 367 Americans, one Australian, 52 Britons, 45 Canadians, three Danes, three Dutch, nine French, 18 Germans, nine Italians, one Norwegian, one Portuguese, four Romanians, one South Korean, 20 Spaniards, two Swedes â€” in the war on terror as of March 12, 2007, according to a CNN count. Below are the names of the soldiers, Marines, airmen and sailors whose deaths have been reported by their countryâ€™s governments. The troops died in support of the U.S.-led Operation Enduring Freedom or were part of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.
Compromised beyond reason, the vastly weakened Democrat-sponsored legislation creeps through Congress.
Pelosi also fielded criticism from lawmakers for removing language from the bill barring military action against Iran without congressional approval. She said the issue would be addressed in future legislation.
â€œWeâ€™re having folks expressing every doubt, every reservation, every aspiration they have for this bill,â€ said Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., another supporter.
In a bid to broaden its appeal, leaders stripped the Iran requirement and omitted language favored by several liberal members that would have specifically prohibited funding of military operations after fall 2008.
While the liberals said this threat would help enforce the deadline, Democratic leaders viewed the politically charged language as unnecessary.
The measure provides nearly $100 billion for two wars, including more money than Bush had requested for operations in Afghanistan, and to address what Democrats called training and equipment shortages. House Republicans say they will work to sink the measure, and the White House threatens a veto.
No withdrawal by 2008. No restrictions on an Iranian adventure. $100 billion for â€œreadiness training and equipment” on top of the $540+ billion already ear-marked for 2007/2008 (this with the US already accounting for 48% of 2006’s total military spending).
Price should say “No deal”.